University of Sydney Staff for Palestine has made a submission to Australia’s Royal Commission on Antisemitism and Social Cohesion. You can read it here.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This submission addresses the nature and prevalence of antisemitism at the University of Sydney, and the civil-liberties implications of current bids to restrict campus political expression in favour of Palestine. It demonstrates that, contrary to frequent claims, there is no evidence of any crisis of antisemitism at the university. Almost always, allegations of antisemitism prove to be criticisms of support for Palestine. No evidence of anything beyond this has ever been produced, including in the 2024 SafeWork NSW report.
Section A of our submission briefly introduces the University of Sydney Staff for Palestine group. Section B addresses a number of key issues relevant to the Commission’s terms of reference: antiracism and the dangers of establishing hierarchies of racism; claims of the existence of a climate of ‘ambient antisemitism’ on campus; the status of anti-Zionism as a political ideology, drawing on remarks by the university’s own special advisor on antisemitism; and the documented use of allegations of antisemitism in order to silence critics of Israel. We pay particular attention to the status of ‘lived experience’ as evidence of antisemitism. We argue that unless the Commission is willing to abandon the distinction between alleged and actual antisemitism, the claim that an interaction was experienced as antisemitic must be rigorously separated from the conclusion that it actually involved antisemitism. Failing to do this means accepting that antisemitism has occurred whenever any Jewish person claims that it has, regardless of any other evidence or considerations.
Sections C and D of the submission document the nature of the allegations of antisemitism made against Palestine supporters at the University of Sydney by drawing on an archive of posts on the university’s internal social network. We demonstrate that these allegations do not target antisemitism, but anti-Zionism – an ideology espoused by growing numbers of Jewish people, which opposes an exclusive Jewish ethnostate in historic Palestine – or, indeed, any expression of support for Palestine in the context of the current genocide. Many allegations treat the mere statement of accepted and widely reported facts of Israeli actions in Gaza as antisemitic. Many others treat the evaluation that Israel’s actions in Gaza are genocide or ethnic cleansing as antisemitic. Many allegations necessitate attributing intentions to Palestine-advocates, including us, of which there is no independent evidence, which we have repeatedly denied, and which are contradicted by numerous other facts on the public record. Further, many allegations entail that major Human Rights organisations, including Jewish ones, and major academic organisations, which include Jewish members, actively promote antisemitism, including ‘blood libel’. The untenability of these allegations should be self-evident.
Section E discusses the extremely concerning implications for civil liberties and academic freedom of current bids to restrict campus expressions of support for Palestine. The University of Sydney is historically one of the centres of critical democratic debate, intellectual freedom and political life in NSW and nationally. Yet the university is, along with other higher education institutions, a focal point of renewed efforts to restrict free speech and academic freedom. Since the start of the genocide, university staff have been subject to a barrage of new policies which effectively punish those publicly opposing Israel’s genocide and its multi-theatre military invasions. The implications of these policies are extremely serious.
We conclude in section F with some remarks on ‘social cohesion’. Antisemitism, like all forms of racism, is abhorrent and has no place in our society or on our campus. But ‘social cohesion’ is not built by elevating one form of racism over others, or by conflating discomfort with safety. It certainly cannot be built by expecting us to ignore genocide and complicity for the sake of civility. The policies aimed to silence dissent are about coercion, not cohesion. While we recognise Islamophobia, antisemitism and other repugnant forms of racism exist, we are convinced that exceptionalising any one form of racism is counterproductive, and in fact has a censorial function.
As we note, the last thirty two months have left people of Palestinian, Lebanese, and Arab origin and their political allies with an unambiguous conclusion: Australian universities will not meaningfully act to oppose genocide, but they will not hesitate to suppress the civil liberties of Palestinians and their supporters, under confected allegations of antisemitism. This situation has clearly only exacerbated both antisemitism and anti-Palestinian racism, and is a flagrant example of the folly and severe social costs of treating some racisms as more serious than others. We urge the Commission to make recommendations that will discourage this extremely dangerous development in Australian politics and society.
Read the rest of the submission here.
Table of Contents
| Executive summary | 3 |
| A. INTRODUCTION | 5 |
| About us | 5 |
| Our experience and expertise | 5 |
| Our antiracist and democratic commitments | 5 |
| Relevance to the Commission’s terms of reference | 7 |
| B. ANTI-SEMITISM: DEFINITION, LIVED EXPERIENCE, POLITICAL INSTRUMENTALISATION | 7 |
| The definitional debate on campus antisemitism | 7 |
| ‘Ambient antisemitism’ | 8 |
| The status of ‘lived experience’ | 9 |
| Anti-Zionism and antisemitism | 9 |
| Political instrumentalisation of claims of antisemitism | 11 |
| C. THE NATURE AND PREVALENCE OF ANTISEMITISM AT THE UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY | 12 |
| No evidence of a crisis of antisemitism at the university | 12 |
| The 2024 SafeWork NSW report and its uncritical media reception | 13 |
| The University of Sydney: an ‘observatory’ of antisemitism allegations | 15 |
| Our source: an archive of internal university social media posts | 16 |
| Allegation 1: Any and all support for Palestine, or opposition to Zionism as antisemitic and/or Nazi | 16 |
| Allegation 2: Accusations of Israeli apartheid, genocide, ethnic cleansing and massacres as antisemitic ‘blood libel’ | 17 |
| Allegation 3: The ‘settler colony’ classification of Israel as antisemitic | 18 |
| Allegation 4: The Palestinian flag as a symbol of Hamas | 19 |
| Allegation 5: Pro-Palestine activism as promoting violence and/or terrorism, supporting Hamas, and seeking the extermination of Jewish people | 19 |
| Allegation 6: Our group University of Sydney Staff for Palestine as seeking the murder of Jews at Bondi | 20 |
| D. AN AMBIENT CLIMATE OF ANTI-PALESTINIAN RACISM AND ZIONIST CHAUVINISM | 21 |
| Israel-defenders regularly demonise anti-Zionist Jews | 21 |
| Islamophobia and anti-Palestinian racism are frequent | 22 |
| Palestinians are often held collectively responsible for the genocide against them | 23 |
| Interim summary of conclusions | 23 |
| E. THE ASSAULT ON BASIC DEMOCRATIC FREEDOMS AT THE UNIVERSITY | |
| An unprecedented crackdown on political and academic freedoms on campus | 24 |
| Enforced civility | 25 |
| F. CONCLUSION | 26 |
| REFERENCES AND FURTHER READING | 27 |








